Inspect the moment.
Review machine-identified objects and visual observations where analysis is available. Return to the frame, watch the lead-up and compare another camera before drawing a conclusion.
Built for litigation
Computer vision
Computer vision
for legal evidence.
Examine video, audio and documents. Compare accounts. Return to the evidence.
Computer vision meets case preparationExamine what the
Examine what the
record actually shows.
A written account and a camera recording may tell different stories. Review video, recorded speech and documents together, then check each observation against the original evidence.
Check the words.
Search the available transcripts and replay the passage. Check commands, responses and surrounding speech against the audio, with uncertain words and speaker labels kept distinct.
Test the account.
Read the original page beside its extracted text. Compare an account with the recordings, note omissions or inconsistencies, and keep the supporting source with the issue.
Spatial intelligence · Research previewPut the camera views
Put the camera views
in context.
When several cameras record the same location, it can be hard to understand how their views fit together. We are developing reconstructed scenes that help lawyers orient themselves and identify which original recordings deserve closer review.
For suitable recordings, reconstruction estimates a shared static scene from overlapping source frames. This is a research preview, not a standard workspace feature. A camera position is not a person's eye position; it does not establish what they saw.
For the questions in your casePrepare with
Prepare with
the record in view.
Use the workspace to develop questions for a witness, examine competing accounts and return to the evidence behind a proposed exhibit.
Does the recording support the account?
Compare a report or statement with the relevant passage. Preserve both supporting and contradictory observations, including context outside the selected moment.
What happened before the disputed act?
Replay the lead-up, listen to the exchange and compare available views. Each recording keeps its own clock unless an alignment has been established.
Which source supports this point?
Keep a document page or recording time with your note. Reopen the original during witness preparation, motion drafting or exhibit review.
From review to preparationFind it. Check it.
Find it. Check it.
Keep it with the case.
Search the record, check a passage in context and save the recording moments you need to revisit.
- 01 · Search the record
Find the words.
Search available transcripts, document text and review observations. Results show which sources were searched and where analysis is still missing.
- 02 · Open the source
Check the context.
Open a document page or jump to a recording time. Read, watch and listen before deciding what the passage or moment supports.
- 03 · Save what matters
Keep your place.
Mark a moment, add a note or set a clip’s start and end. Keep the source and time attached so you can return to the same evidence during preparation.
Attorney judgment comes firstKeep findings
Keep findings
grounded in evidence.
AI helps you investigate. You decide what the record supports.
Check the source and the authority.
Doctrine Engine supports legal research alongside evidence review. Where research is available, open the cited opinion and evaluate its application to your facts. A suggested connection is not a legal conclusion.
Distinguish a lead from a finding.
Machine observations, transcripts and summaries require review. Missing analysis is not evidence that nothing happened. Reconstruction is separate from original footage and does not by itself establish admissibility.
Security
Your evidence deserves careful handling.
Review deployment, access and retention arrangements before your pilot begins. Agree on the scope before transferring evidence, and evaluate the output against the source.
Review security and data handling
Where it is stored
Amazon Web Services in the U.S. (N. Virginia), encrypted at rest with AWS KMS, public access blocked, versioning on.
Original evidence
Original files are retained separately from machine-generated results. Review the source identification and retention arrangements for your matter.
Matter access
Signing in does not grant access to every matter. Workspace membership and matter permissions determine the evidence a user can open.
Sign-in
Sign in securely with your account. Workspace membership determines which matters you can open.
Downloads
Evidence downloads require authorized matter access. Storage credentials are not supplied to the browser.
Automated evidence processing
The automated evidence pipeline runs in our AWS account in the U.S. Cloudflare serves the website and video streaming. Confirm the hosting and data handling of any additional research services before your pilot.
What we do not claim: security certifications, a separate environment for each firm, or write-once storage. Deployment and retention terms are agreed with you in writing before a pilot.
Start
Bring a case.
Bring a case.
Choose a question.
Start with a representative set of recordings and documents. We’ll agree on the review scope, confirm which sources can be processed and walk through the results with your team.
See it on your case
Tell us about your firm, your evidence and the review challenge.
Please do not submit confidential case details through this form.
We reply within one business day. This form does not upload evidence.
Existing customer? Sign in
Checking secure sign-in…